Global Warming and Hurricanes

January 23rd, 2006

It is very irritating as an Atmospheric Scientist to watch newscasts. Global warming is blamed for everything from the shrinking of the Pika’s habitat to the recent increased hurricane activity. Granted, industrialization has and will continue to cause changes in the world’s atmosphere. The question is whether every change is related to industrialization or the natural long-term cycle of warming and cooling of the earth. Some changes are related; the ozone hole over the poles, increased carbon dioxide levels in the troposphere. Some changes are not, in my opinion, related. One of these is the increased hurricane activity over the past two years.

The increased hurricane activity is related to the natural cycle of the earth. Hurricane paths and formation are correlated to the location of upper tropospheric systems in the tropics. For a tropical depression to form, ideal conditions are required. Very limited vertical wind shear and warm ocean temperatures are two of these conditions. Vertical wind shear is defined as the difference in wind direction and speed as you go from the surface up into the atmosphere. For instance, if you have winds coming from the east at the surface and winds from the west above the surface, you are in a sheared environment.

Where do you find limited amounts of vertical wind shear? It is highly dependant on the locations of the upper tropospheric high and low pressure systems over the Atlantic Ocean. If there is a pattern that moves the upper level high pressure over 500 miles west, then (theoretically) you will move the ideal formation zone for hurricanes 500 miles west. So that helps to explain one aspect of the recent hurricanes; the tracks.

Now for the increased number. The Director of the National Hurricane Center, Max Mayfield, says it better than I can:

“The increased activity since 1995 is due to natural fluctuations (and) cycles of hurricane activity driven by the Atlantic Ocean itself along with the atmosphere above it and not enhanced substantially by global warming.” This was part of Max Mayfield’s testimony in front of Congress.

Basically it boils down to this. We have had satellite technology since roughly the 1960s. That’s 40 years of observing the weather over the oceans (where hurricanes come from). The natural cycles of the earth operate on much more than 40 year cycles. Prior to satellite technology, reports of hurricanes relied upon ships intersecting the storms, surviving through them to get the report out, and accurately relaying the information. We have very little data on hurricanes, their frequency and intensity prior to 1960.

It may seem like we are suddenly being besieged by hurricanes, but in reality we are observing a natural cycle.

Nixon Had his tapes, Cheney has his email

January 22nd, 2006

This is a repost something I did on an old Live Journal blog a couple years ago. It may be old news, but it still disgusts me. My updates to the post will be in Italics

Well Golly! When are these high ranking elected officials going to learn to stop keeping such great records that eventually incriminate them, or in the very least catch them in a lie. We have no reason to believe that charges for the invasion of Iraq will not be pursued in a future attempt to bring justice to the perpetrators of the liberties taking with constitutional interpretation.

I am of course referring to the secret White House audio recording system that led to the explosion of the Watergate scandle many years ago, and to the recently (not so recently since this was from 2003 when I was still pissed (and I guess I still am) about having to go to a bullshit war) uncovered e-mail that details the cozyness between Vice-President Chaney and his corporate alma mater, Halliburton.

In a nutshell, Chaney was the CEO of Halliburton for about five years before he decided to join Bush for the Republican presidential ticket in 2000. (If you don’t know this, there are things you should be reading instead of this blog, you know, to catch up with the rest of America)

While I am not sure if it is actually a legal requirement that one sell one’s stock and cut ties with a former employer before accepting such a high office, it certainly seems like a good idea, you know in the interest of how things look and all. Well, despite what was said, it appears that not only did Chaney not dissolve his involvement with Halliburton as he has claimed to, but he was orchestrating (illegally) no bid contracts to be granted to his former employer that would greatly benefit him (the increase in the value of his stock) and his old cronies. As of today, the value of Chaney’s 433,333 shares of Halliburton stock have a value of $12,488,657.06. For the record, in the fall of 2000, the value of his shares was about $6,066,662. (That was the amount in 2003, the current price per share of HAL is $75.50, which makes his holdings worth $32,716,642, assuming he has not gotten rid of any, and I have found nothing that says he has, and why would he, it is a fucking great ROI (Return on Investment for you non-business school types) .Those of us who have taken elementary math can see that those numbers represent an astronomical gain! They also show us that the lives of 800 American military personal (that too was in 2003, the loss of life is now at 2225) are worth about $6 million (about $26 million now).

Keep in mind that this all happened before the country was told of the intention of going to war in the first place. If Bush were to be believed, which is a laughable concept in itself, one would think that they were trying to resolve the bone that the U.S. had to pick with Iraq diplomatically. But this was in the fall of 2002.

So, in conclusion, we have yet another high ranking government leader, you know, the 2nd in control of the entire U.S. Govt., who has decided that the laws that are designed to prevent exactly what he has done to prevent despicable war profiteering (profiting off of dead soldiers) weren’t acceptable to him so he thought he would just ignore them. What a schmuck.

For your viewing pleasure, I am including links to articles where I gleamed my information.

Article Highlighting the existence of the e-mail that proves Chaney’s intent to profit on dead soldiers
Chaney’s finances…

Book Title Audition

January 19th, 2006

“Don’t Try To Lose Weight if You Can’t Afford New Pants”
Subtitle: Ben [my last name here] textually

Comments?

Just woke up

January 18th, 2006

I dreamed that I met Jimmy Carter and that he graciously posed for pictures with me.

Jesus looks great in a bloody hockey mask

January 18th, 2006

There are many other outfits to choose from, so don’t be shy, lets play dressup with our savior.

Be sure to come back and tell me how you dressed the Messiah in the comments!

IOGEAR KVM Switch

January 13th, 2006

I was told recently that I am not technically a Mac switcher. I am what is known as a dual-user. I don’t really like labels. I use a decent Gateway laptop and I am typing this post on my Dell. I also own, use and love my Mac Mini. I recently sold a computer and along with it went my other flat panel monitor and infared moouse. This created a problem. How was I to use the Dell with no mouse or monitor. The solution for me is the IOGEAR 2port USB KVM (Keyboard Video Mouse) switch with audio support (model #GCS632U).

So far so good, all functions seem to be working, and using this Apple keyboard has not presented any problems as of yet. I am still able to use windows shortcut keys for things like paste etc.

The only problem I have with this model is that while there is audio support, it is only for the computer you are currently working on. I can’t leave iTunes playing on the Mac and switch to the PC and hear the music and vice versa. This is of no great importance though so I am pleased to have much less equipment on my desk and the ability to switch back and forth from PC to Mac with a simple hotkey combination. Who could ask for more. (Well I would like to have gotten a DVI model because the Dell and the Mac both have DVI video outs and the monitor has a DVI in, but they are very expensive. One was as much as paid for the Mac mini and larger than the actual computer).

Still a happy Mac convert here…

January 9th, 2006

I am not alone in my love for the cure for the common computer. Daphne Kalfon has written a song aptly titled “I Love My Mac.” Click on the song title to go to her website.

Here are the lyrics.

whenever I want, to plug in a peripheral
it recognizes it right away
I don’t have to sweat, and pray for a small miracle
it’s just great for me
I’m as happy as can be
and I have better productivity

I love my Mac
cuz its so dependable, so sensible so beautiful
oh it’s the only one for me
repeat

there’s never a need, to think about security, trojan horses and viruses
they don’t stand a chance, they are such a rarity
it’s just working fine
I have such peace of mind
and there’s a bond of a special kind

I love my Mac
cuz it’s so dependable, so sensible so beautiful
oh it’s the only one for me
repeat

any software I use, is always so reliable
and I can find almost anything
forums chat groups message boards and newsgroups are commendable
it’s all there for me
one big family
of Mac enthusiasts from sea to sea

I love my Mac
cuz it’s so dependable, so sensible so beautiful
oh it’s the only one for me
repeat

iPods, Macdraw, Appletalk, Powerbooks
iTunes, Quicktime, Final Cut, Appleworks
iMacs, Panther, Firewire, USB iMovie iChat and iDvd
but the greatest one for me
it’s been the answer to my dreams
it’s the best app in the land
the funnest program ever known to man
why, Garage Band

I love my Mac
cuz it’s so dependable, so sensible, so beautiful
oh it’s the only one for me
repeat

More words of wisdom from our good friend Pat

January 5th, 2006

Why do we love Pat Robertson so much? I think it’s because everytime he speaks, he gives us more pearls of wisdom. His latest rant is about how God has smote Prime Minister Sharon.

Oh Pat, you crazy religious whack you.

At what point to war supporters have blood on their hands?

January 3rd, 2006

I read a typical right wing blog post, claiming to debunk some nasty weak kneed liberal. The thing is the only method employed to “debunk” the Starbucks drinking, namby pamby, blinkered, milktoast, was to use already discredited “facts.”

I tried to set him straight, but what they need is a visit from the reality based community. You know who you are. Why don’t you go give him your $0.02.

Back to work

January 1st, 2006

I hope everyone enjoyed the holidays… now it is back to the Ad Hominem, the mud slinging and the healthy discourse. I expect you to comment if you are reading my blog. This means you. I’m kidding, but seriously…